From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Glanzmann Subject: Re: gitweb wishlist Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:29:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20050524182951.GB9537@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <1116626652.12975.118.camel@dhcp-188> <428E745C.30304@zytor.com> <4292A08A.5050108@cobite.com> <20050524161745.GA9537@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 24 20:30:14 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dae8e-0002LN-Vl for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:28:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261935AbVEXS36 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 14:29:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261946AbVEXS36 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 14:29:58 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:19595 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261935AbVEXS34 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 14:29:56 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.30.103]) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4OITpS8022912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 May 2005 18:29:51 GMT Received: (from sithglan@localhost) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j4OITpC9022911; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:29:51 +0200 (CEST) To: Git Mailing List Mail-Followup-To: Git Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello, > - name translation doesn't exist (so all of Peters changesets get > reported as author "hpa ") I pick that up. > - the commit time will be the conversion time, not the original commit > time (but the _author_ time will be correct). I suspect that for a > conversion like this, we really should add support for GIT_COMMIT_DATE. Thanks. I wanted to send patches or at least ask you this for ages, but never did. :-) Thomas