From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Glanzmann Subject: Re: gitweb wishlist Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 23:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20050524215238.GG25606@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20050524161745.GA9537@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050524184612.GA23637@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20050524202846.GC25606@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Mansfield , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kay Sievers , Petr Baudis , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 24 23:53:40 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DahJO-0003tK-LZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:51:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262206AbVEXVw4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262202AbVEXVw4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:56 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:42926 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262206AbVEXVwr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 17:52:47 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.30.103]) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4OLqdS8006808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 May 2005 21:52:39 GMT Received: (from sithglan@localhost) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j4OLqcui006807; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:52:39 +0200 (CEST) To: Linus Torvalds Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , David Mansfield , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kay Sievers , Petr Baudis , Git Mailing List Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello, > Ahh, the mutt people really use something else for development, and this > is just an export into CVS (like the Linux bkcvs tree)? Or do they just > have fast machines and no networking? Or are there good versions of CVS > around that re-use the same time across one whole commit? I did one sampling and though it would be representative which it isn't. What I don't understand why noone ever fixed this? cvs has its own rcs implementation anyway to speed things up, hasn't it? Thomas