From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: ALSA official git repository Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:51:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20050527135124.0d98c33e.akpm@osdl.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 27 22:49:33 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbllM-0005x9-0g for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 22:49:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262591AbVE0Uu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:50:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262590AbVE0Uu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:50:56 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:8832 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262589AbVE0Uuj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:50:39 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4RKoZjA005979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 27 May 2005 13:50:35 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id j4RKoY6o008538; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:50:34 -0700 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.40__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > Okay, sorry for this small bug. I'll recreate the ALSA git tree with > > proper comments again. Also, the author is not correct (should be taken > > from the first Signed-off-by:). > > Hmm.. That's not always true in general, since Sign-off does allow to sign > off on other peoples patches (see the "(b)" clause in DCO), but maybe in > the ALSA tree it is. Yes, I'll occasionally do patches which were written by "A" as: From: A ... Signed-off-by: B And that comes through email as: ... From: ... From: A ... Signed-off-by: B which means that the algorithm for identifying the author is "the final From:". I guess the bug here is the use of From: to identify the primary author, because transporting the patch via email adds ambiguity. Maybe we should introduce "^Author:"?