From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: -p diff output and the 'Index:' line Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 09:15:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20050529071520.GC1036@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 29 09:13:25 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcHyx-00068O-GX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 09:13:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261261AbVE2HP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2005 03:15:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261263AbVE2HP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2005 03:15:26 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:36581 "HELO machine.sinus.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261261AbVE2HPW (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2005 03:15:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 5736 invoked by uid 2001); 29 May 2005 07:15:20 -0000 To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello, so I've tried how would cg-diff output look like if I used the git-diff -p argument, and I found that I miss the 'Index:' line. Actually, what I really miss is the separator ==== line just below, but it'd probably look weird without the 'Index:' line. I became used to the separators and they enable me to quickly visually notice the files boundary, which is more drudging if you have just the 'diff --git' line. What do you think? Would you hate it to show up in the diffs, or are you ok with it? Thanks, -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor