git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
To: Mark Allen <mrallen1@yahoo.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [COGITO PATCH] Fix cg-log and cg-status for non-GNU sed/sort
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 01:49:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050529234911.GZ1036@pasky.ji.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050529234326.12407.qmail@web41203.mail.yahoo.com>

Dear diary, on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:43:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Mark Allen <mrallen1@yahoo.com> told me that...
> --- Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:00:10AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Mark Allen <mrallen1@yahoo.com> told me that...
> > > -                               pdate="$(showdate $date)"
> > > +                               pdate="$(date -u -r $date)"
> > 
> > Hmm, coudlnt' showdate be fixed instead then? And $date is not a file so
> > -r $date makes no sense to me - what am I missing?
> 
> There is no showdate(1) command on Darwin.  On Darwin, the date(1) command flags are

There's probably no showdate command at all. This is internal function
defined in cg-Xlib. ;-)

> -u (show UTC)
> -r seconds 
> 
> So `date -u -r $date` gives output like "Sun May 29 12:07:55 GMT 2005" instead of
> 1117336545

GNU date:

  -r, --reference=FILE      display the last modification time of FILE

> > > -                               echo; sed -re '
> > > -                                       /
> > *Signed-off-by:.*/Is//'$colsignoff'&'$coldefault'/
> > > -                                       /
> > *Acked-by:.*/Is//'$colsignoff'&'$coldefault'/
> > > -                                       s/./    &/
> > > -                               '
> > > +                               echo; sed -e "/ *Signed-off-by:.*/s/
> > *Signed-off-by:.*/$colsignoff&$coldefault/" -e"/
> > > +*Acked-by:.*/s/ *Acked-by:.*/$colsignoff&$coldefault/" -e "s/./    &/"
> > > +
> > 
> > Is it necessary to take away the newlines? What is the real problem,
> > actually? Just the I flag?
> 
> Is it strictly necessary to take away the newlines? I don't know. To be honest, I didn't 
> experiment too much with alternate implementations. But the I flag in the sed script, 
> yes that is not understood by non-GNU sed. And the "-r" to sed itself is also
> problematic.

I think we don't really need -r anyway. Could you please try with the
'i' flag instead of 'I'? (The manpage is somewhat unclear on the
difference and portability.) Also, could you try if it works with the
newlines?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-29 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-29 23:00 [COGITO PATCH] Fix cg-log and cg-status for non-GNU sed/sort Mark Allen
2005-05-29 23:16 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-29 23:43   ` Mark Allen
2005-05-29 23:49     ` Petr Baudis [this message]
2005-05-30 17:00       ` Alecs King
2005-05-31  1:19       ` Mark Allen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050529234911.GZ1036@pasky.ji.cz \
    --to=pasky@ucw.cz \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrallen1@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).