From: Christopher Li <hg@chrisli.org>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
mercurial@selenic.com
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:38:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050624123819.GD9519@64m.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050624064101.GB14292@pasky.ji.cz>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > 5.1) undo the last commit or pull
> >
> > $ hg undo
>
> $ cg-admin-uncommit
>
> Note that you should never do this if you already pushed the changes
> out, or someone might get them. (That holds for regular Git too.) See
>
> $ cg-help cg-admin-uncommit # (or cg-admin-uncommit --help)
>
> for details. (That's another Cogito's cool feature. Handy docs! ;-)
>
Does it still works if the last commit was interrupted or due to error for some
reason? Undo pull is pretty cool because you might pull a lot of commit
in one blow. Get rid of commit one by one is going to be painful. Some times
the object you pull has more than one chain of history it will be very nasty
if you want to clean it up.
Mercurial's undo is taking a snapshot of all the changed file's repo file length
at every commit or pull. It just truncate the file to original size and undo
is done.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-22 22:24 Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 22:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:52 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-23 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25 3:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25 17:29 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-22 23:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 0:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 1:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 1:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 2:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 2:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 3:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 3:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 5:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 5:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 6:20 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 7:11 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 7:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 7:38 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-23 8:18 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-06-23 8:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-23 14:31 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-22 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 1:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 7:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 15:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 0:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 2:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 2:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 3:52 ` Adam Kropelin
2005-06-23 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 5:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 6:07 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 7:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23 8:01 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-06-23 4:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-23 12:25 ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 23:56 ` Mercurial vs " Matt Mackall
2005-06-24 6:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 12:38 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2005-06-28 15:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:10 ` Andrew Thompson
2005-06-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 21:54 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-28 18:47 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-29 0:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 18:01 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 20:27 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 20:45 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:14 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:23 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 22:49 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:59 ` Sean
2005-06-28 23:25 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 23:37 ` Sean
2005-06-29 0:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 0:25 ` Sean
2005-06-29 3:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 10:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-28 23:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-29 6:32 ` Thomas Arendsen Hein
2005-06-24 13:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-24 13:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-24 13:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-06-24 12:19 ` Christopher Li
2005-06-24 13:57 ` Kevin Smith
2005-06-24 18:03 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 15:07 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:15 ` Sven Verdoolaege
2005-06-28 15:34 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 16:50 ` Cygwin and Native MS Windows (was: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers) Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 16:51 ` Cogito vs. Git " Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 20:54 ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 13:16 ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Matthias Urlichs
2005-06-24 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-24 19:25 ` John W. Linville
2005-06-24 22:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-24 21:11 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-24 22:08 ` Should "git-read-tree -m -u" delete files? Junio C Hamano
2005-06-24 22:45 ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Joel Becker
2005-06-24 23:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 18:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-27 19:05 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 19:40 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 19:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-27 20:51 ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 21:53 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-07-08 15:18 ` Amin Azez
2005-07-11 8:56 ` Amin Azez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050624123819.GD9519@64m.dyndns.org \
--to=hg@chrisli.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).