From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:06:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20050624130604.GK17715@g5.random> References: <42B9E536.60704@pobox.com> <20050623235634.GC14426@waste.org> <20050624064101.GB14292@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matt Mackall , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel , Git Mailing List , mercurial@selenic.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 24 15:04:45 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dlnq0-0004nd-0I for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:03:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262479AbVFXNIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:08:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262423AbVFXNIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:08:48 -0400 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:63535 "EHLO g5.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262416AbVFXNGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:06:10 -0400 Received: by g5.random (Postfix, from userid 500) id E5C9557538B; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:06:04 +0200 (CEST) To: Petr Baudis Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050624064101.GB14292@pasky.ji.cz> X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Cool. Except where the concepts are just different, Cogito mostly > appears at least equally simple to use as Mercurial. Yes, some features > are missing yet. I hope to fix that soon. :-) The user interface and network protocol isn't the big deal, the big deal is the more efficient on-disk storage format IMHO.