From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vojtech Pavlik Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:27:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20050629102746.GA2484@ucw.cz> References: <3886.10.10.10.24.1119991512.squirrel@linux1> <20050628221422.GT12006@waste.org> <3993.10.10.10.24.1119997389.squirrel@linux1> <20050628224946.GU12006@waste.org> <4846.10.10.10.24.1119999568.squirrel@linux1> <40A9C7C2-1AFE-45BC-90A5-571628304479@mac.com> <1765.10.10.10.24.1120001856.squirrel@linux1> <40A4071C-ED45-4280-928F-BCFC8761F47E@mac.com> <2661.10.10.10.24.1120004702.squirrel@linux1> <12B6F9A5-81F8-46BD-A05D-B9FA1A70A9FF@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sean , Matt Mackall , Petr Baudis , Christopher Li , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel , Git Mailing List , mercurial@selenic.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 29 12:21:21 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnZgZ-0007VF-5F for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:20:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262500AbVF2K1u (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:27:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbVF2K1u (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:27:50 -0400 Received: from s243.chello.upc.cz ([62.24.84.243]:25564 "EHLO suse.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262500AbVF2K1f (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:27:35 -0400 Received: by suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10002) id 0F85E126AC6; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:27:46 +0200 (CEST) To: Kyle Moffett Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12B6F9A5-81F8-46BD-A05D-B9FA1A70A9FF@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:53:47PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote: > >there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over > >choice of scm. > > I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will > be long before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, > such that I can "hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have > Linus "git pull" from a multiprotocol bridge. I hope this will happen sooner than later, since that way the competition between git and mercurial will give us the best tools while keeping interoperability. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR