From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.12 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:55:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20050710075548.A11765@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <12c511ca05070716526954edd@mail.gmail.com> <12c511ca050707170964a2cc92@mail.gmail.com> <20050709225818.A31045@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050709232955.B31045@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <7vpstrv8z6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Tony Luck , Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 10 08:56:10 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrVjW-0002QC-5W for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:56:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261857AbVGJGz4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:55:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261861AbVGJGz4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:55:56 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:51721 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261857AbVGJGzy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:55:54 -0400 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:d412:e8ba:1:201:2ff:fe14:8fad]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1DrVjB-0000yW-UW; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:55:50 +0100 Received: from rmk by flint.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1DrVjA-0006gK-NF; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:55:48 +0100 To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@osdl.org on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:15:41PM -0700 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:15:41PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So you can fix this by getting the current git release, but you probably > shouldn't even care. Just use the pack-files as pack-files instead, and > enjoy the higher performance and lower disk use ;). I would if I could, but my workflow involves having an untouched local copy of your tree and several trees for each area. This involves updates using relative paths, and as has already been found elsewhere, this (with cogito 0.12) doesn't work with packed objects yet. -- Russell King