From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: qgit-0.7 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:43:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20050710134309.GA24935@elte.hu> References: <20050710122531.15175.qmail@web26303.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 10 15:43:47 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Drc5Z-0007gS-3C for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:43:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261931AbVGJNnM (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:43:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261942AbVGJNnM (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:43:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:35025 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261931AbVGJNnK (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:43:10 -0400 Received: from chiara.elte.hu (chiara.elte.hu [157.181.150.200]) by mx1.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54C32AAFA; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chiara.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 17806) id EB8BE1FC2; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:42:59 +0200 (CEST) To: Marco Costalba Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050710122531.15175.qmail@web26303.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org * Marco Costalba wrote: > So I cannot reproduce the bug. [...] weird - i cannot reproduce it either anymore, and annotate works now as advertised - it's fast and accurate as far as i checked. But i synced to the latest tree meanwhile. Perhaps i had an inconsistent tree? (i'll keep an eye on this, i've uncommented that printout, so if it ever happens again i'll have the data.) now that everything is working fine, may i suggest improvements? :-) Firstly, now i'm listed as the author for most portions of sched.c, which is accurate for a fair portion of that, but is only done by qgit because i happened to be the author of the first commit. So it would be more accurate to denote version 1's author as empty (or with some other, nonintrusive string that shows that this file came here due to the initial commit)? We dont know the full history yet, because the current DB's history starts at 2.6.12-rc2, with a full sched.c file. (I think an empty author field would reflect version #1's authorship most accurately, and would be the visually least intrusive.) Ingo