From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Singer Subject: Why is there no git-update-cache --modified (aka I give up) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:52:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20050712055218.GA18192@buici.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 12 07:53:35 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsDhY-000549-Kp for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:53:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262376AbVGLFwU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:52:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262377AbVGLFwU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:52:20 -0400 Received: from florence.buici.com ([206.124.142.26]:43419 "HELO florence.buici.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262376AbVGLFwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:52:19 -0400 Received: (qmail 18280 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jul 2005 05:52:18 -0000 To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org # git-diff-cache HEAD is really nice. But, do I really have to invoke git-update-cache with every modified file? I could write a script to cul the filenames from git-diff-cache, but I'm having a hard time believing that that is how others are preparing their commits.