From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:06:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20050729070628.GA24895@pasky.ji.cz> References: <7vll3rlnqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <20050728120806.GA2391@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728153506.GL14229@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728161815.GC17952@pasky.ji.cz> <7v1x5ic1pe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050728183904.GA24948@pasky.ji.cz> <7v4qaeqrh3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Josef Weidendorfer , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 29 09:07:25 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyOxi-00024d-NO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:07:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262469AbVG2HGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262459AbVG2HGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:54 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:13579 "HELO machine.sinus.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262469AbVG2HGl (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 25834 invoked by uid 2001); 29 Jul 2005 07:06:30 -0000 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v4qaeqrh3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:24:40AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano told me that... > Petr Baudis writes: > > > One of the Cogito design bits is that branch name is something local to > > the repository. When you are adding a branch, the local name you assign > > it is your private thing repository-wise, and doesn't have to have any > > correlation to other repositories you might interact width. > > I do not disagree with that. I think branch name is mostly a > local matter. However, I happen to think that two repositories > you use send-pack (not clone which uses completely different > protocol) to sync one from the other are semantically equivalent > ones, except that the destination may be a strict subset. I > think of it as "a copy I throw at a public place to show what I > have in my private repository I work in", so,... Aha, so it seems our problem is hopefully only in terminology, great. So, what do you mean by "clone" here? And what command should I use for pushing then? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox