From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Anderson Subject: Re: Git 1.0 Synopis (Draft v2) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20050729082730.GC32263@mythryan2.michonline.com> References: <20050727100123.GH19290@mythryan2.michonline.com> <7vek9jq4n5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 29 10:28:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyQDr-0000kd-LN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:28:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262524AbVG2I1i (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262520AbVG2I1g (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:36 -0400 Received: from mail.autoweb.net ([198.172.237.26]:55729 "EHLO mail.autoweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262523AbVG2I1c (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:32 -0400 Received: from pcp01184054pcs.strl301.mi.comcast.net ([68.60.186.73] helo=michonline.com) by mail.autoweb.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DyQDK-0003Vx-Pz; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:30 -0400 Received: from mythical ([10.254.251.11] ident=Debian-exim) by michonline.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DyQMh-0002gh-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:37:11 -0400 Received: from ryan by mythical with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DyQDK-0000tF-7u; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:27:30 -0400 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vek9jq4n5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Git results from the inspiration and frustration of Linus Torvalds, and > > the enthusiastic help of over 300 participants on the development > > mailing list.[1] It is maintained by Junio C Hamano . > > Please drop the e-mail address here; you mention nobody else's. > > Well, dropping "the current maintainer" information altogether > might be even better; the above to a casual reader sounds like > Linus was frustrated and I wrote it for him, which is definitely > not what we would like to say. I suspect it still has more code > by Linus than anybody else (I stopped counting some time ago). Ok. I was thinking I could add "current" into that description. Or, something like, "Linus has since returned his focus to the kernel, and passed maintainership to ...". -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere