From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:32:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20050811203258.GA3560@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <46a038f9050810155642bb5580@mail.gmail.com> <20050810233953.GV28270@kiste.smurf.noris.de> <46a038f90508102144358a4bcf@mail.gmail.com> <20050811201558.GA2874@mars.ravnborg.org> <20050811202410.GB5411@kiste.smurf.noris.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sebastian Kuzminsky , Linus Torvalds , Martin Langhoff , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 11 22:29:48 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3JgK-0004WW-Sd for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:29:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932389AbVHKU3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:29:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932440AbVHKU3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:29:38 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:11856 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932389AbVHKU3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:29:38 -0400 Received: from mars.ravnborg.org (0x50a0757d.hrnxx9.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.160.117.125]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF347FECA; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:29:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mars.ravnborg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 706D96AC01D; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:32:58 +0200 (CEST) To: Matthias Urlichs Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811202410.GB5411@kiste.smurf.noris.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Sam Ravnborg: > > > > > > Anyway, enough of this. I understand the name will not change and I'm > > > ok with that. I'll deal with it on our (Debian's) end. > > > > The easy fix is to kill the small git script that is not > > mandatory anyway (as far as my quick grep told me). > > I'd vote to keep the scripts in the default build, so that people > who like to compile their own package (i.e. everybody _except_ the > Debian packager ;-) get to keep their git and cg scripts. > > A small Debian-specific patch to rename the offending scripts (and drop > the Conflicts: entries) is cheap. Yep - my comment was directed to debian only. Not git-core. Sam