From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Subject: Re: gitweb feature request: tarball for each commit Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20050908113207.GA30178@vrfy.org> References: <46a038f905090721305dcbf61@mail.gmail.com> <20050908084545.GH15165MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 08 13:32:51 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDKdZ-0007QG-Vw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:32:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932449AbVIHLcK (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:32:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932458AbVIHLcK (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:32:10 -0400 Received: from soundwarez.org ([217.160.171.123]:27103 "EHLO soundwarez.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932449AbVIHLcJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:32:09 -0400 Received: by soundwarez.org (Postfix, from userid 2702) id 7B0205F353; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:32:07 +0200 (CEST) To: Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050908084545.GH15165MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:45:45AM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:22PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > Actually... should get it done. I'll see if I can sneak it in sometime soon... > > This has been done at least twice already. > See e.g., http://www.liacs.nl/~sverdool/gitweb.cgi?p=gitweb.git;a=summary > Check the archives for the other implementation. Yes, this is nice for smaller projects. But I don't think, that we want to do such a thing on the kernel.org servers. We already have the daily snapshots and individual patches can be downloaded from gitweb. Anybody else should use git/cogito instead of letting the server packaging a huge tree for every requested revison, I think. Kay