git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: junkio@cox.net, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-bisect failure
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:13:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050910141343.578649c7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509101202070.30958@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  >
>  > Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > So it _might_
>  > >  be possible that you said "current LDT" was bad when it was
>  > >  actually good.  That is one possible explanation.
>  > 
>  > I agree.  Mea culpa.  Sorry.
> 
>  Well, this was actually something I hit when testign bisection too: it 
>  _is_ very unforgiving of mistakes.

Yes.  That was my third attempt.  You basically _have_ to write down the
good/bad sequence as you go.  One slip and you've blown an hour's work.

>  So the bisection algorithm may have done the right thing from a technical 
>  standpoint, but I suspect it could be made to be a bit more forgiving, or 
>  at least when somebody realizes that bisection didn't work right, we could 
>  have the trail of good/bad markings to try to debug what happened...

Yup.  Simply keeping a little log file would suffice.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-10 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-09  8:10 git-bisect failure Andrew Morton
2005-09-09  9:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-10  2:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-10  9:26   ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 19:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 21:13       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-09-10 21:32         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-10 21:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-10 22:13           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050910141343.578649c7.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).