From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.7 Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20051002121059.GA32367@elte.hu> References: <1128244627.9740.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: GIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 02 14:11:04 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EM2fe-0007QZ-Q6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:10:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751086AbVJBMKR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 08:10:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751088AbVJBMKR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 08:10:17 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40126 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751086AbVJBMKQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 08:10:16 -0400 Received: from chiara.elte.hu ([157.181.151.252]) by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1EM2fX-00033c-8m from ; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:10:15 +0200 Received: by chiara.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 17806) id BECA11FC2; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:10:14 +0200 (CEST) To: Catalin Marinas Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1128244627.9740.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Received-SPF: softfail (mx3.mail.elte.hu: transitioning domain of elte.hu does not designate 157.181.151.252 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.181.151.252; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=chiara.elte.hu; X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Catalin Marinas wrote: > Stacked GIT 0.7 release is available from > http://www.procode.org/stgit/ > > StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt > (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT. These > operations are performed using GIT commands and the patches are stored > as GIT commit objects, allowing easy merging of the StGIT patches into > other repositories using standard GIT functionality. i'm wondering - have you (or anyone else) done performance comparisons of quilt vs. stgit, using the same stack of patches? One of the most important features of quilt (for me) is that it's very fast at popping/pushing through hundreds of patches. Ingo