From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gitweb.cgi
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:23:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051019012341.GA15256@vrfy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510181753340.3369@g5.osdl.org>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 06:02:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > It turns out that the default CacheSize is only 256K. D'oh! Fixed.
> >
> > I also changed the CacheDefaultExpire to 600 seconds.
>
> Ok, that sounds like it should improve things. My quick tests didn't seem
> to show any difference, though. Do you need to re-load the apache module
> or something?
>
> > The only thing the front page really should need is to know when the last
> > change to the tree was, which presumably means looking at each head of each
> > tree and follow the chain until there is a datable object.
>
> Yeah. I tried to follow gitweb.cgi, but I'm neither http- nor
> perl-literate, so I'm not sure I caught everything.
>
> But it does seem to basically end up doing a "git_read_commit()" for each
> project, and that in turn was doing the "git-rev-list --max-count=1" thing
> that I just sent out a suggested improvement for.
>
> It effectively removes two or more copies of
>
> stat64("/objects/xy/zzy", {...})
> fd = open("objects/xy/zzy", O_RDONLY|O_NOATIME)
> addr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0)
> close(fd)
> munmap(addr, size)
>
> which really should be very cheap operations, but hey, if the disk head is
> somewhere else (and busy) and it's not cached, it can be quite expensive.
> Especially since we don't end up usign the result.
>
> I'm sure there's room for improvement inside gitweb itself too, but maybe
> the git-rev-list optimization will help.
There definitely is! But I tried a single "stat() all HEAD files" with a
simple script and it took more than 3 seconds for the 80 trees. Then I
gave up "optimizing" and was sure we want to have a single-file cached front
page instead. :)
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-19 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 2:57 gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-18 11:07 ` gitweb.cgi Kay Sievers
2005-10-18 16:52 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-18 17:24 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-18 20:44 ` gitweb.cgi Brian Gerst
2005-10-19 0:27 ` gitweb.cgi Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 0:30 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-19 0:53 ` Optimize common case of git-rev-list (was Re: gitweb.cgi) Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 0:38 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-19 1:02 ` gitweb.cgi Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 1:14 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-19 13:59 ` gitweb.cgi Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 16:16 ` gitweb.cgi H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-19 1:23 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2005-10-19 1:33 ` gitweb.cgi Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051019012341.GA15256@vrfy.org \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).