From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange differences in cogito on SPARC and i386
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:44:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051021004411.GA30889@pasky.or.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510171906.j9HJ6AQr015777@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
Dear diary, on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:06:10PM CEST, I got a letter
where Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> told me that...
> git, cogito up to date everywhere.
Does that mean the latest development trees or the latest release
vesions? If the latter, could you try the former, please?
> [vonbrand@pincoya linux-2.6.git]$ cg-update
> Recovering from a previously interrupted fetch...
> 15:04:56 URL:http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/HEAD [41/41] -> "refs/heads/.origin-fetching" [1]
> Getting alternates list
> progress: 10 objects, 24166 bytes
> error: Empty reply from server (curl_result = 52, http_code = 0, sha1 = 0801ec7bf4953784f0f3279c1a80258ad29094d6)
> Getting pack list
> progress: 11 objects, 24873 bytes
> error: Unable to find 0801ec7bf4953784f0f3279c1a80258ad29094d6 under http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/
>
> Just started again each time, seems to work fine. On i386 the download goes
> smoothly, no hickups. And there are /no/ updates while SPARC is working its
> head off getting updates...
>
> Then again, today on the SPARC it is getting several thousand objects (!),
> while on i386 it was only a few dozen.
>
> Some stupid pilot error? Got different mirrors between machines? Sounds
> unlikely, as repeating the command (and presumably rotating between DNS
> entries) makes no difference.
Well, can you repeat the bug using git pull? (Try just "git pull".) If
so, and if you will slightly modify the subject in your reply, you
should hopefully get some interested debuggers who know this stuff
better. ;-) But I've seen those reports before, and it seems something
is rotten in the realm of fetching...
> Just finished SPARCwise. Almost 10K objects for changes to 4 files?! Yes,
> the files changed are the same on both machines.
This might be because of the interrupted merge - if it says the
"recovering" message, it will try to make sure you really have all the
objects, and depending on your exact git version, I can imagine it might
re-fetch some of them for some reason.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-21 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-17 19:06 Strange differences in cogito on SPARC and i386 Horst von Brand
2005-10-21 0:44 ` Petr Baudis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051021004411.GA30889@pasky.or.cz \
--to=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).