From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Oeser Subject: Re: GIT 0.99.9e Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:02:36 +0100 Message-ID: <200511072002.42772.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> References: <7v64r5t3m0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051107154718.GJ3001@reactrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2176071.jntZa4YZN3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 07 20:03:12 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZCGc-0001Sb-Su for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:02:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964950AbVKGTCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:02:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964953AbVKGTCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:02:51 -0500 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:62156 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964950AbVKGTCu (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:02:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 22696 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 19:02:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p5483cfa1.dip.t-dialin.net) (696817@[84.131.207.161]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 19:02:47 -0000 To: Nick Hengeveld User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 In-Reply-To: <20051107154718.GJ3001@reactrix.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --nextPart2176071.jntZa4YZN3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 07 November 2005 16:47, Nick Hengeveld wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >=20 > > - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be > > expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be > > ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a > > showstopper. >=20 > It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should > it be dav-push? Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but > it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later > on. e.g. GIT encapsulated in SOAP /me *ducks* and *runs* Ingo Oeser --nextPart2176071.jntZa4YZN3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDb6TSU56oYWuOrkARAo8NAKC93PDomAM9NKVqhEIn0HQ9Gal+FQCfV1Ia 3E3YSOTWkQkJPRx765uGH2o= =sysc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2176071.jntZa4YZN3--