From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: make tests ignorable with "make -i" Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:16:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20051108211618.GA3224@steel.home> References: <81b0412b0511080151v69bc4578we093eaa751ee4bac@mail.gmail.com> <7vmzkfey4o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 08 22:19:34 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZapb-0007Ct-V6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:16:40 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030240AbVKHVQd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:16:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030283AbVKHVQd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:16:33 -0500 Received: from devrace.com ([198.63.210.113]:8709 "EHLO devrace.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030240AbVKHVQd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:16:33 -0500 Received: from tigra.home (p54A0D61D.dip.t-dialin.net [84.160.214.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by devrace.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA8LGKQ2080384; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:16:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fork0@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from steel.home ([192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EZapG-0000n7-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:16:18 +0100 Received: from raa by steel.home with local (Exim 4.42 #1 (Debian)) id 1EZapG-0001HL-HE; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:16:18 +0100 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vmzkfey4o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on devrace.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, Tue, Nov 08, 2005 20:29:59 +0100: > > ... (Or to ignore plainly uninteresting situations because of the > > testing being done on say... cygwin ;) > > Could you tell us which ones break on Cygwin? > of course. I remember t4000-diff-format having problems, using chmod +x and comparing the results afterwards (it's not really cygwin problem, but FAT). I let the whole suite running tomorrow and just post the failed here (instead of dreaming how nice would it be to live in a perfect world).