From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Geiss Subject: Re: git-archimport Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:24:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20051111232428.GS9131@raven.localdomain> References: <46a038f90511101332r3389734uc1aa1effd2898e15@mail.gmail.com> <20051110214959.GO9131@raven.localdomain> <46a038f90511101421o7988a1bfi89eb0e33bd34e4bb@mail.gmail.com> <20051111051910.GP9131@raven.localdomain> <46a038f90511102158k5078e37fn2558cf69bc5794fa@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kevin Geiss , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 12 00:25:10 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaiFz-0001Kk-W4 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:24:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751378AbVKKXY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:24:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751379AbVKKXY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:24:29 -0500 Received: from 12-219-167-192.client.mchsi.com ([12.219.167.192]:12504 "EHLO desertsol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751378AbVKKXY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:24:29 -0500 Received: from kevin by desertsol.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EaiFw-0004hN-9f; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:24:28 -0700 To: Martin Langhoff Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46a038f90511102158k5078e37fn2558cf69bc5794fa@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.desertsol.com/~kevin/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: it's not really public, perhaps I can make it public though. can a tla mirror be served over http? or does it require ssh? I'm confident the gpg signatures aren't the problem. I imported some branches yesterday which were all signed, they worked fine. I suspuect the problem is that after tagging the oco branch from the base branch, there are several places where I replayed some patches from one of the branches to the other. some patches were skipped, some were replayed. there was definitely a lot of hard core cherry picking going on, in both directions. do you think that would cause a problem? the branches I've imported successfully were things where I had version 1, then tagged that to create version 2, then tagged that to create version 3, with no replay or merging going on between the branches. (everything was gpg signed though) On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:58:34PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On 11/11/05, Kevin Geiss wrote: > > gpg: Signature made Mon Feb 14 12:28:10 2005 MST using DSA key ID E1E6A3B1 > > I've never imported a signed changeset, perhaps that's the problem. Is > the repo public so I can test it myself? > > cheers, > > martin >