From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: git-pack-redundant returns the most containing pack Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:09:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20051116230956.GA21444@steel.home> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 17 00:11:57 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcWPv-00036X-3L for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:10:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030575AbVKPXKL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:10:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030576AbVKPXKL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:10:11 -0500 Received: from devrace.com ([198.63.210.113]:30474 "EHLO devrace.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030575AbVKPXKJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:10:09 -0500 Received: from tigra.home (p54A0CE2A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.160.206.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by devrace.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAGN9wY1099010; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:10:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fork0@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from steel.home ([192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EcWPc-0000Wf-00; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:09:56 +0100 Received: from raa by steel.home with local (Exim 4.42 #1 (Debian)) id 1EcWPc-0005cf-Mp; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:09:56 +0100 To: Lukas =?iso-8859-15?Q?Sandstr=F6m?= Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on devrace.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: ...which very confusing: "git-repack -a -d" leaves the repository with exactly the same packs as before, by creating a super-pack, and then happily removing it, because pack-redundant returns the newly created pack! So, even if it is logically correct, it's hardly useful in practice.