From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Anderson Subject: Re: git-send-mail in sh Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:33:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20051125163358.GF16995@mythryan2.michonline.com> References: <4386DD45.6030308@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 25 17:36:32 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfgXQ-0003DF-El for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:35:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161124AbVKYQeD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:34:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161126AbVKYQeD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:34:03 -0500 Received: from mail.autoweb.net ([198.172.237.26]:4054 "EHLO mail.internal.autoweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161124AbVKYQeB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:34:01 -0500 Received: from pcp01184054pcs.strl301.mi.comcast.net ([68.60.186.73] helo=michonline.com) by mail.internal.autoweb.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfgWM-0008KH-QL; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:34:00 -0500 Received: from mythical ([10.254.251.11] ident=Debian-exim) by michonline.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EfgWM-0005qL-00; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:33:58 -0500 Received: from ryan by mythical with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EfgWM-0006Yq-BP; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:33:58 -0500 To: Andreas Ericsson Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4386DD45.6030308@op5.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Finally giving up on git-send-email (I won't install the 6 perl-modules > it requires and I don't know perl enough to remove the need for them), I > hacked up a replacement in sh. It's more aptly named as well. ;) Scanning the list, 2 are related to option handling (one of which is builtin), one isn't used (Data::Dumper), and two are related to sending valid emails. The email address verification is ridiculously hard to get correct, so using pre-written code for that seemed justified. > It's worse than the perl version because; > 1. It doesn't thread the patch-series (which I personally prefer anyway > since it's easier to follow a thread on a particular patch that way). You can use --no-chain-reply-to in git-send-email.perl, and put a 0/N message in, and all subsequent replies get attached to that instead of in order, if you want. This keeps everything in one thread, but all as responses to the first email, so the people that want everything in one thread can get that behavior. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere