Re: lost again on syntax change - local repository?

[Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>]

Dear diary, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:09:40PM CET, I got a letter
where "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> said that...
> >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> Petr> Dear diary, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:01:18AM CET, I got a letter
> Petr> where "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> said that...
> >> localhost:..Git/Play/local.git % cg-branch-add origin "$(cd ..; pwd)/remote.git#master"
> 
> Petr> BTW, it should be fine to just say ../remote.git#master.
> 
> Maybe this is why yours worked.
> 
> Ahh, yes, it did.
> 
> So, cg-push treats '../..' differently from '/foo/bar/...'.
> 
> This is bad.  That's the bug.

Nope, the relative path is resolved at the time of adding the branch.
Check for yourself:

xpasky@machine[0:0]~/git-devel/x/local.git$ cg-branch-add origin "$(cd ..; pwd)/remote.git#master"
xpasky@machine[0:0]~/git-devel/x/local.git$ cg-branch-add origin2 ../remote.git#master
xpasky@machine[0:0]~/git-devel/x/local.git$ cg-branch-ls
origin  /home/xpasky/git-devel/x/remote.git#master
origin2 /home/xpasky/git-devel/x/remote.git#master

Pushing to both works fine.

> cg-push treats "../" as a local filesystem, and "/..." as git-ssh.
> This is a change from before.
> 
> Please make it recognize "/..." as a local file again.

It would sure be bad if this was the case. However I'm really sorry, but
I still can't reproduce it.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.