From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: use binmode(STDOUT) in git-status Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:12:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20051129221221.GC3033@steel.home> References: <81b0412b0511272334w393434e7lad3e3b102e6c3e9e@mail.gmail.com> <438B2859.6060109@zytor.com> <438B2B90.9010500@zytor.com> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 29 23:17:21 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhDiG-0008VS-PW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:12:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964781AbVK2WMe (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:12:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964784AbVK2WMe (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:12:34 -0500 Received: from devrace.com ([198.63.210.113]:1034 "EHLO devrace.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964781AbVK2WMd (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:12:33 -0500 Received: from tigra.home (p54A0CEB2.dip.t-dialin.net [84.160.206.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by devrace.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jATMCN2P022119; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:12:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fork0@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from steel.home ([192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EhDi1-0002js-00; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:12:21 +0100 Received: from raa by steel.home with local (Exim 4.42 #1 (Debian)) id 1EhDi1-00037C-J6; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:12:21 +0100 To: Johannes Schindelin Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=4.5 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on devrace.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin, Mon, Nov 28, 2005 17:56:58 +0100: > > if you're running Cygwin, wouldn't Cygwin's Perl make a lot more sense? > > I thought so, too, but I guess there's a reason that Activision's perl was > used. the reason were incompatible scripts (notably, the ones expecting crlf).