git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@horizon.com
To: junkio@cox.net, torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, linux@horizon.com, pasky@suse.cz
Subject: Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug
Date: 30 Nov 2005 01:09:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051130060906.13277.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511292031280.3099@g5.osdl.org>

> +-0 -1 -2::
> +	When an unmerged entry is seen, diff against the base version,
> +	the "first branch" or the "second branch" respectively.
> +
> +	The default is to diff against the first branch.
> +

Er... why are these flags zero-based?

git-ls-files -s displays them as "1", "2" and "3".  All the docs talk
about "stage1", "stage2" and "stage3".

Change the nomenclature if you want, but this mixed messages business is
kind of weird...

(Heartened by the response to my previous question of "why do you do
this thing that makes no sense to me", I'm going to be bold and not ask
why this is a good idea.)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-30  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-28 23:42 git-name-rev off-by-one bug linux
2005-11-29  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-29  8:05   ` linux
2005-11-29  9:29     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  8:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-29 10:31     ` Petr Baudis
2005-11-29 18:46       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-04 21:34         ` Petr Baudis
2005-12-08  6:34           ` as promised, docs: git for the confused linux
2005-12-08 21:53             ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-08 22:02               ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-09  0:47             ` Alan Chandler
2005-12-09  1:45               ` Petr Baudis
2005-12-09  1:19             ` Josef Weidendorfer
2005-11-29 21:40       ` git-name-rev off-by-one bug linux
2005-11-29 23:14         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  0:15           ` linux
2005-11-30  0:53             ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  1:27               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  1:51             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-30  2:06               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  2:33               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  3:12                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-30  5:06                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-30  5:51                     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  6:11                       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30 16:13                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-30 16:08                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-02  8:25                       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02  9:14                         ` [PATCH] merge-one-file: make sure we create the merged file Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02  9:15                         ` [PATCH] merge-one-file: make sure we do not mismerge symbolic links Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02  9:16                         ` [PATCH] git-merge documentation: conflicting merge leaves higher stages in index Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  6:09                     ` linux [this message]
2005-11-30  6:39                       ` git-name-rev off-by-one bug Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30 13:10                         ` More merge questions linux
2005-11-30 18:37                           ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-11-30 20:23                           ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02  9:19                             ` More merge questions (why doesn't this work?) linux
2005-12-02 10:12                               ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02 13:09                                 ` Sven Verdoolaege
2005-12-02 20:32                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-05 15:01                                     ` Sven Verdoolaege
2005-12-02 11:37                               ` linux
2005-12-02 20:31                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02 21:32                                   ` linux
2005-12-02 22:00                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-02 22:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-02 23:14                                       ` linux
2005-12-02 21:56                                   ` More merge questions linux
2005-11-30 16:12                       ` git-name-rev off-by-one bug Linus Torvalds
2005-11-30  7:18                   ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  9:05                     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  9:42                     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30  3:15                 ` linux
2005-11-30 18:11               ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-11-30 17:46   ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-11-30 20:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30 21:06       ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-11-30 22:00         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-30 23:12           ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-12-01  7:46             ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-01 10:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-01 21:50   ` Petr Baudis
2005-12-01 21:53     ` Randal L. Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051130060906.13277.qmail@science.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=pasky@suse.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).