From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Add the accurate changeset applyer Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:51:50 -0800 Message-ID: <20051203025150.GA13179@mail.yhbt.net> References: <46a038f90511170126l5f04f4e0ta578fc2cb375db68@mail.gmail.com> <20051124074605.GA4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124074739.GB4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124074857.GC4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124075027.GD4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124075133.GE4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124075243.GF4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124075355.GG4789@mail.yhbt.net> <20051124075504.GH4789@mail.yhbt.net> <46a038f90512010902lb11c326p99af9ff99dacf9b4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git list , Martin Langhoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 03 03:54:03 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiNVC-0004PO-TC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:51:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751170AbVLCCvw (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:51:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751174AbVLCCvw (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:51:52 -0500 Received: from hand.yhbt.net ([66.150.188.102]:65200 "EHLO mail.yhbt.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751170AbVLCCvv (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:51:51 -0500 Received: by mail.yhbt.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 01BCC2DC03A; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:51:50 -0800 (PST) To: Martin Langhoff Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46a038f90512010902lb11c326p99af9ff99dacf9b4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Langhoff wrote: > Eric, > > My test results are a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, I'm satisfied > that both fast and correct imports reach the same tree (minus file > modes) for the same commit with the arch repos I imported. > > On the other hand, with my "moodle" repo, the 'correct' import seems > to have stop importing a lot earlier than it should have. I am > re-running it now to try to continue from where it left off, but it's > unclear why it abandoned -- I didn't see any error. How widely have > you tested this method? This was from the moodle repo I archive-mirrored locally a few weeks ago for testing: get_new: 6 get_tag: 0 import_or_tag: 0 replay: 356 Rerunning it doesn't seem to pull anymore. IIRC, My previous times only imported around ~150 patchsets. The time it took to run this was certainly longer than the last run (~4 hours here, vs ~2 hours I mentioned in <20051124074605.GA4789@mail.yhbt.net>, so there may be a bug somewhere... Unfortunately, I no longer have those old trees around. I've imported several trees with >1000 revisions without problems, mpd-uclinux is among them: http://mpd.bogomips.org/mpd-uclinux.git/ -- Eric Wong