From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force" Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:22:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20060120182255.GD32177@fieldses.org> References: <1137144291.20073.104.camel@dv> <1137517300.20556.26.camel@dv> <20060117215752.GH32585@nowhere.earth> <1137539762.12454.11.camel@dv> <20060118193717.GI32585@nowhere.earth> <1137631749.13853.22.camel@dv> <20060119213838.GA27397@nowhere.earth> <1137738224.27911.26.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yann Dirson , Catalin Marinas , git , Charles Lever X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 20 19:23:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F00ug-00017x-MT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:23:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751135AbWATSXD (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:23:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751137AbWATSXD (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:23:03 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:62922 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135AbWATSXB (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:23:01 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F00uV-0001t3-IX; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:22:55 -0500 To: Pavel Roskin Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1137738224.27911.26.camel@dv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:23:44AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > That command could be "cat" to get the current "refresh" behaviour, or > > an editor wrapper acting on stdin/out, or a wrapper to filterdiff, or > > whatever clever filter one would want to use. > > > > Does it sound better ? > > Yes. The first step would be to fix "stg refresh --edit --showpatch" to > actually respect edits made to the patch. I tend to use stg refresh -es as a quick (well, not quite as quick as I'd like) way to look at the current patch. Often I leave it up while I'm working (editing the patched files). So if exiting from stg refresh -es suddenly started overwriting my working files, I'd be very unhappy.... --b.