From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [Census] So who uses git? Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:06:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20060131200630.GB16561@fieldses.org> References: <46a038f90601251810m1086d353ne8c7147edee4962a@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90601272133o53438987ka6b97c21d0cdf921@mail.gmail.com> <1138446030.9919.112.camel@evo.keithp.com> <7vzmlgt5zt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060130185822.GA24487@hpsvcnb.fc.hp.com> <20060131181248.GE11955@fieldses.org> <7vbqxsyyym.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Johannes Schindelin , Carl Baldwin , Keith Packard , Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 31 21:07:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F41m3-0006uS-Aw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:06:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751420AbWAaUGo (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:06:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751421AbWAaUGo (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:06:44 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:36274 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751420AbWAaUGn (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:06:43 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F41lm-0004yJ-UJ; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:06:30 -0500 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vbqxsyyym.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:33:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think many good stuff git offers would not be helpful to the > users until index is understood as the third entity, in addition > to the usual "committed state" and "working tree state". It > might be better to talk about it sooner rather than later. And > the tool is geared towards taking advantage of it, so until the > user understands that, behaviour of some tools would feel > unintuitive. Yeah, makes sense. But I'd like to introduce that while still introducing the higher-level tools earlier on than core-tutorial.txt does. I'll give some thought to how to move things in that direction, maybe this weekend.... --b.