From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [Census] So who uses git? Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:52:47 -0500 Message-ID: <20060131215247.GF16561@fieldses.org> References: <46a038f90601251810m1086d353ne8c7147edee4962a@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90601272133o53438987ka6b97c21d0cdf921@mail.gmail.com> <1138446030.9919.112.camel@evo.keithp.com> <7vzmlgt5zt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1138529385.9919.185.camel@evo.keithp.com> <43DCA495.9040301@gorzow.mm.pl> <20060130225107.GA3857@limbo.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Riesen , Radoslaw Szkodzinski , Keith Packard , Junio C Hamano , cworth@cworth.org, Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 31 22:53:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F43R1-0001BC-K2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:53:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751546AbWAaVxD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:53:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751550AbWAaVxD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:53:03 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:44267 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbWAaVxB (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:53:01 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F43Qd-00064E-JD; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:52:47 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:25:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So we could speed it up on cygwin (and yes, it would speed git up a lot > even on Linux, but since the cached lstat() case is so fast anyway, I > doubt a lot of Linux users care - the biggest win would be on a cold-cache > tree). But it would require that you explicitly _mark_ the files you edit > some way. You couldn't depend on a combination of lstat's and some kind of filesystem change notifications? --b.