From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Smith Subject: Re: Tracking and committing back to Subversion? Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:06:58 -0800 Message-ID: <200602091706.59521.linuxfood@linuxfood.net> References: <1138834301.21899.40.camel@wilber.wgtn.cat-it.co.nz> <200602091650.55370.linuxfood@linuxfood.net> <7vk6c43ue5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 10 02:07:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Mke-00083m-SD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:07:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750950AbWBJBHF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:07:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750953AbWBJBHF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:07:05 -0500 Received: from [67.124.82.122] ([67.124.82.122]:37959 "EHLO linuxfood.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbWBJBHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:07:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 4597 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2006 17:07:03 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO borealis.linuxfood.net) (192.168.1.2) by 192.168.1.6 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Feb 2006 17:07:03 -0800 To: Junio C Hamano User-Agent: KMail/1.9 In-Reply-To: <7vk6c43ue5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 09 February 2006 16:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Brian Smith writes: > > While that is an admirable goal, unless you can point me to something > > that will allow you to actually commit back to SVN without a working > > copy, it defeats the purpose of my tools which is basically to use to git > > for the purpose of holding intermediate development before sending it > > into SVN as a final commit. > > Wouldn't svk (or svl or whatever it is called these days) be a > better match for that kind of "keep my work while disconnected > from master svn repository" purpose? It would, if it wasn't god awful slow. And besides, AFAIK, it doesn't allow you to do anything other than keep offline work in a separate SVN repo hosted on your machine, which means I can't use the git tools.