From: linux@horizon.com
To: cworth@cworth.org
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New git-seek command with documentation and test.
Date: 23 Feb 2006 19:29:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060224002915.17331.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
The annoying thing about temporary branch names like "bisect" and "seek"
is that:
a) They clutter up the nae space available to the repository user.
Users have to know that those are reserved names.
b) If a repository is cloned while they're in use, they might get
into a "remotes" file, with even more confusing results.
This is somewhat heretical, but how about making a truly unnamed branch by
having .git/HEAD *not* be a symlink, but rather hold a commit ID directly?
It's already well established that files in the .git directory directly
are strictly local to this working directory, so it seems a much better
home for such temporary state.
Admittedly, this requires more invasive edits (particularly adding a third
legitimate case to validate_symref()), but it seems to make more sense.
And be ultimately simpler than workarounds for the above problems.
Just loosen the rules from ".git/HEAD must be a symlink" to
".git/HEAD must be a symlink before you can check in".
Yes, I know it's radical. At least I'm not questioning the
power and efficacy of indulgences. :-)
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-24 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-24 0:29 linux [this message]
2006-02-24 0:54 ` [PATCH] New git-seek command with documentation and test Johannes Schindelin
2006-02-24 1:23 ` linux
2006-02-24 6:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-02-24 10:11 ` Andreas Ericsson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-14 16:28 several quick questions Nicolas Vilz 'niv'
2006-02-14 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-14 18:10 ` Carl Worth
2006-02-14 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-14 20:10 ` Carl Worth
2006-02-14 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-14 21:53 ` Carl Worth
2006-02-14 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-23 20:31 ` [PATCH] New git-seek command with documentation and test Carl Worth
2006-02-24 0:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-24 10:00 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-02-24 11:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-24 14:23 ` Carl Worth
2006-02-24 21:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-02-24 21:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060224002915.17331.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=cworth@cworth.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).