From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radoslaw Szkodzinski Subject: Re: Question about possible git races Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:51:46 +0100 Message-ID: <200603232151.51493.astralstorm@o2.pl> References: <200603201724.12442.astralstorm@o2.pl> <200603230224.54736.astralstorm@o2.pl> <44220E21.7040204@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3637211.FcdfBFPgkT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 23 21:56:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMWqG-0006zE-QW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:55:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932118AbWCWUze (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:55:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932150AbWCWUze (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:55:34 -0500 Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:4521 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118AbWCWUzd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:55:33 -0500 Received: from zen.localdomain (host-81-190-201-167.gorzow.mm.pl [81.190.201.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F252748106; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:55:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from zen.localdomain ([192.168.0.1]) by zen.localdomain with esmtpa (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FMWn5-0004Ao-JP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:52:19 +0100 To: Andreas Ericsson User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <44220E21.7040204@op5.se> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --nextPart3637211.FcdfBFPgkT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 23 March 2006 03:55, Andreas Ericsson wrote yet: > Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:28, Andreas Ericsson wrote yet: > >>Btw. I'm assuming you're aware you'll have to GPL this app of yours, > >>since git is GPL and you'll be using the git produce in a way that makes > >>it vital to your app. > > > > It will be, but not because of git (it's execve()ing it), but rather > > because of the principle. > > Ah, Good Thing. Just to clarify for the archives though, it *is* > required since it's using git in a way that makes git a fundamental, > non-replaceable part of its core operations. > > > Intermediate results will probably be: > > - later yet another porcelain, written in C > > yagit? yagp? What I wanna know is when jigit's gonna hit the streets. :) I need a memorable three-letter acronym, so it will be gip. (Git porcelain = In=20 Python) and the C one... later. GIP also stands for Good Informatics Practices :P or "to swindle", but it's= =20 the deprecated usage, I think. It has some racial ties. Conflicts with: GNOME IP calculator - http://www.debain.org/software/gip/ I'd get myself a better commandline IP calculator than give a good TLA to=20 this. Gnip should be the name. What's jigit? Did I miss something? =2D-=20 GPG Key id: 0xD1F10BA2 =46ingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0 9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2 AstralStorm --nextPart3637211.FcdfBFPgkT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEIwpnlUMEU9HxC6IRAmOTAJ4jFBYXs877M3E+cqc0QlBnRaZ07QCfViiH EQeeGZY2CS2kmWwQACskEvA= =oNKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3637211.FcdfBFPgkT--