From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH 31/49] PCI: PCI/Cardbus cards hidden, needs pci=assign-busses to fix Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:17:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20060324061706.GA11248@kroah.com> References: <20060323161521.28a874e6.akpm@osdl.org> <20060324002930.GA21184@kroah.com> <20060323163844.5fda7589.akpm@osdl.org> <20060324004654.GA19763@kroah.com> <7vbqvw3a62.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060323175126.7ff71032.akpm@osdl.org> <7v3bh837cs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 24 07:19:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMfde-0000BE-Is for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:19:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751022AbWCXGTH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:19:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751552AbWCXGTH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:19:07 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:24029 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbWCXGTF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:19:05 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.128] (dsl093-040-174.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.40.174]) (authenticated) by perch.kroah.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2O6J2K08493; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:19:02 -0800 Received: from greg by press.kroah.org with local (masqmail 0.2.19) id 1FMfbf-30L-00; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:17:07 -0800 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v3bh837cs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:27:15PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andrew Morton writes: > > > We wouldn't want to attempt to mix this concept up with email envelopes or > > email headers or anything like that. The authorship is an attribute of the > > patch, and has nothing to do with how it was transported, stored or > > anything like that. > > Fair enough. This is the approach I called "the second best" in > my message but I am inclined to agree with you. > > This was tested once by sending myself two patches. Oops, just saw this after I sent out the last set of patches. It looks good to me, I'll try it out next time. And yes, I did write the original version of this perl script, but it's been fixed up and made useful by Ryan. thanks, greg k-h