git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Effective difference between git-rebase and git-resolve
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:29:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060326202927.GA6436@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vacbfxadu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:15:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>      - Patch C does not apply.  git-am stops here, with conflicts to
>        be resolved in the working tree.  Yet-to-be-applied D and E
>        are still kept in .dotest/ directory at this point.  What the
>        user does is exactly the same as fixing up unapplicable patch
>        when running git-am:
>     
>        - Resolve conflict just like any merge conflicts.
>        - "git am --resolved --3way" to continue applying the patches.

So, does this sum it up accurately for the man page?

--b.

Document git-rebase behavior on conflicts.

---

 Documentation/git-rebase.txt |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

3ef0c8cc7a505f9023a87e7e1ca22251a91bf188
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index b36276c..4a7e67a 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ would be:
              /
     D---E---F---G master
 
+In case of conflict, git-rebase will stop at the first problematic commit
+and leave conflict markers in the tree.  After resolving the conflict manually
+and updating the index with the desired resolution, you can continue the
+rebasing process with
+
+    git am --resolved --3way
+
+Alternatively, you can undo the git-rebase with
+
+    git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD
+    rm -r .dotest
+
 OPTIONS
 -------
 <newbase>::
-- 
1.2.4.g0382

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-26 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-25  3:54 Effective difference between git-rebase and git-resolve Marc Singer
2006-03-25  4:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-25  6:08   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-25  6:32     ` Marc Singer
2006-03-25  7:15       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-26 20:29         ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20060325043507.GA14644@buici.com>
2006-03-25  6:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-25  9:37       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-03-25 11:08         ` Mark Wooding
2006-03-25 11:26           ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060326202927.GA6436@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=elf@buici.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).