From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
To: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:27:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060404152737.GN27689@pasky.or.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060404121056.GB14967@reactrix.com>
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:10:57PM CEST, I got a letter
where Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com> said that...
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Well, what is the actual advantage of DAV compared to
> > git-update-server-info? Why would I prefer enabling DAV?
>
> In theory, things should work the same either way. It seems that in
> practice though, the server info files continue to surface as a source
> of fetch problems.
Because people do not know they have to set up their post-update hook.
When they are already going at lengths to find out how to set up DAV for
git fetch, they would discover the post-update hook way as well.
So, it really seems rather redundant to me.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time. I think
I have forgotten this before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-04 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-03 16:01 HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone) Daniel Drake
2006-04-03 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-03 18:09 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-04-04 7:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-04 10:00 ` Petr Baudis
2006-04-04 12:10 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-04-04 15:27 ` Petr Baudis [this message]
2006-04-04 17:56 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-04-03 18:28 ` Daniel Drake
2006-04-04 18:01 ` Nick Hengeveld
2006-04-05 12:23 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060404152737.GN27689@pasky.or.cz \
--to=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickh@reactrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox