From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sean Subject: Re: Two gitweb feature requests Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1146144425.11909.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kay.sievers@vrfy.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 28 18:31:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVs3-0007SA-9J for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:31:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030485AbWD1QbD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:31:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030488AbWD1QbD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:31:03 -0400 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp02.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.162]:38085 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP02.bayc1.hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030485AbWD1QbB (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:31:01 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [69.156.138.66] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([69.156.138.66]) by BAYC1-PASMTP02.bayc1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:31:00 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local (guru.attic.local [10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733FE644C17; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:30:59 -0400 (EDT) To: David Woodhouse Message-Id: <20060428122630.234edde4.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <1146144425.11909.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.15; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2006 16:31:00.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[22AB5F00:01C66AE1] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:05 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote: > First... When publishing trees, I currently give both the git:// URL for > people who want to pull the tree, and the http:// URL to gitweb for > those who just want to browse. > > It would be useful if I could get away with giving just one URL -- > probably the http:// one to gitweb. If gitweb were to have a mode in > which it gave a referral to the git:// URL, and if the git tools would > use that, then that would work well. This sounds like a good idea. > Secondly, it would be useful if gitweb would list the branches in a > repository and allow each of them to be viewed in the same way as it > does the master branch. At the bottom of the Summary page it already lists the branches, underneath the tags. Sean