From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Timo Hirvonen <tihirvon@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] gitopt: a new command-line option parser for git
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:39:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060509193932.GB3676@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v8xpb73sq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Timo Hirvonen <tihirvon@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> >
> >> * unbundling of short options: -uC20n20z => -u -C20 -n20 -z
> >
> > Does anyone ever use this? I think this makes sense only for flags that
> > don't have parameters but that would create an ugly special case. Is it
> > too hard to type "-u -C=20 -n=20 -z"?
>
> I can already hear in my head that people would start talking
> about "git understands insane abbeviations of options". It
> might be unambiguous, but that does not change it is a bit on
> the insane side. People would probably expect -nuz can be split
> into -n -u -z, and the current handcrafted mess (although it is
> more obvious and easy to work with when reading and maintaining
> the existing code) is not abbreviation friendly, which we would
> want to do something about. But I think squashing options with
> parameters together is going a bit too far.
I think numeric parameters are unambiguous when bundled.
I'm used to things like `diff -ru10p` working, *shrug*
Non-numeric parameters can only be used if the option is at the end of the
bundled string:
git commit -sam'this is my commit message' would work
git commit -m'say hello' would also work
but git commit -mas'this is my commit message' would not work as intended
(where user wanted -a -s, too)
> > --with-r => --patch-with-raw works great
>
> I personally think this also is too much.
There are (currently) two types of abbreviations, one is the prefix one used
commonly in shell scripts: -e|--e|--ed|--edi|--edit. I think this should
always be supported as most of our shell scripts already do.
The other one tokenizes on '-' first and looks for a prefix match after
each '-'. I'd like to make that at least optional:
diff --git a/gitopt.c b/gitopt.c
index 056e163..9ca6025 100644
--- a/gitopt.c
+++ b/gitopt.c
gitopt.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void fallback_long(const struct o
}
/* ok, try harder, based on tokenization on '-' */
- if (found < 0) {
+ if (found < 0 && getenv("GIT_ABBREV_HARDER")) {
for (i = 0; ost[i].l || ost[i].s; i++) {
s = &(ost[i]);
if (s->l && opt_token_match(s,cur)) {
--
Eric Wong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-09 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-09 5:06 [PATCH/RFC] gitopt - command-line parsing enhancements Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] gitopt: a new command-line option parser for git Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] update-index: convert to using gitopt Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] ls-tree: convert to gitopt Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] ls-files: convert to using gitopt Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] gitopt: convert setup_revisions(), and diff_opt_parse() Eric Wong
2006-05-09 5:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] commit: allow --pretty= args to be abbreviated Eric Wong
2006-05-09 7:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] gitopt: convert setup_revisions(), and diff_opt_parse() Eric Wong
2006-05-11 20:19 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-09 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] gitopt: a new command-line option parser for git Timo Hirvonen
2006-05-09 12:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-09 19:39 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2006-05-09 19:18 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-09 20:10 ` Timo Hirvonen
2006-05-09 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-09 21:08 ` Timo Hirvonen
2006-05-09 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-09 21:31 ` Timo Hirvonen
2006-05-09 8:35 ` [PATCH/RFC] gitopt - command-line parsing enhancements Junio C Hamano
2006-05-09 19:48 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-09 20:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-09 21:14 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060509193932.GB3676@localdomain \
--to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=tihirvon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).