From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Pearce Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make '@' not valid in a ref name. Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20060521015849.GB7605@spearce.org> References: <20060521013751.GA7516@spearce.org> <7vodxsywzk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 21 03:58:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhdDe-0000fm-AK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:58:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbWEUB6x (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751417AbWEUB6x (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:53 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:7891 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbWEUB6x (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:53 -0400 Received: from cpe-72-226-60-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([72.226.60.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FhdDM-0005qs-9p; Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:40 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B49E2212691; Sat, 20 May 2006 21:58:49 -0400 (EDT) To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vodxsywzk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > I am not a fan of retroactively disallowing what we used to > allow. Is this unavoidable? > We're talking about it on #git right now. Someone actually uses refs like 'user@host/foo' and thus doesn't like this patch either. We were talking about disallowing '@{' instead. Really its just '@{