From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Pearce Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Enable ref log creation in git checkout -b. Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20060524035234.GA13329@spearce.org> References: <20060519091716.GM22257@spearce.org> <7vk68fyarn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 24 05:52:53 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FikQW-0003JQ-NB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 05:52:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932183AbWEXDwj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932480AbWEXDwj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:39 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:50903 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932183AbWEXDwj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:39 -0400 Received: from cpe-72-226-60-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([72.226.60.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FikQ4-0007fz-Dl; Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:24 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4270420FB0C; Tue, 23 May 2006 23:52:35 -0400 (EDT) To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vk68fyarn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > I've swallowed all 10 and pushed them out in "pu", but could you > add tests to check the Porcelainish commands you touched with > this series to make sure they all log correctly? Sure. I've been putting it off as I've been busy the past few days and have also been thinking about trying to rebuild reflog using a tag/annotation branch style, which might be more generally useful to others. So I've been debating about whether or not I should ask you to pop reflog out of pu indefinately. > BTW, I noticed that a patch earlier in the series depended on > something not in "master" (it's rfc2822_date from js/fmt-patch > series). Generally I do not want to make a branch hostage of > another branch by introducing a dependency, but for now I'll > pull in early part of js/fmt-patch branch into sp/reflog branch > and see what happens. Doh. Sorry about that one. I saw it in date.c and used it, not realizing it was only in pu. -- Shawn.