From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Anderson Subject: Re: t8001-annotate.sh fails on Mac OS X Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:40:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20060527014037.GA11935@h4x0r5.com> References: <20060526011153.GA27720@spearce.org> <7vpsi1qyi2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Shawn Pearce , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 27 03:41:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjnnZ-0005uF-IZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2006 03:41:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751751AbWE0Bk6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 21:40:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751750AbWE0Bk6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 21:40:58 -0400 Received: from h4x0r5.com ([70.85.31.202]:60432 "EHLO h4x0r5.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751234AbWE0Bk5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 21:40:57 -0400 Received: from ryan by h4x0r5.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1FjnnC-0006Rn-VS; Fri, 26 May 2006 18:40:39 -0700 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vpsi1qyi2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-michonline.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-michonline.com-MailScanner-From: ryan@h4x0r5.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:02:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Shawn Pearce writes: > > > I think we had hoped that one of the two tools would prove to be > > _the_ annotation/blame tool and would get used but thus far that > > hasn't happened. > > I've been taking this as an indication that annotate/blame does > not actually matter in the real world. It probably doesn't matter in the real world. At the moment, I'd blame annotate for being wrong, I know it does the wrong thing on some merges, and I had a plan to try to fix it, but I got distracted by finding a new job and moving across the country, so I haven't really had a chance to fix it, something to look at shortly, I hope. (I'm having problems getting one of my machines back up, so that's going to slow me down slightly) > Or git is not yet used in the real world. Or perhaps a bit of > both. It's just that "annotate" isn't a common operation in the communities that Git has made it into.