Re: [RFC] git commit --branch

[Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]

hoi :)

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:14:32PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Doesn't
> 
> $ git-update-index $(git-ls-files --modified)
> $ git-checkout -b tempBranch
> $ git-commit -m "to test"
> 
> work? It also avoids totally bogus parents (if I read your patch 
> correctly, you take the current HEAD as the true parent, but record the 
> current HEAD of the other branch as parent nevertheless).

I'm doing two commits, one to HEAD and one to the other branch.
It is more like:

	git commit
	git checkout otherbranch
	git rebase --onto otherbranch master^ master   <-- first
	git checkout master
	git merge msg master otherbranch               <-- second

Now your current HEAD is still a merge of your topic branches,
and you commited your changes to one clean topic branch.

-- 
Martin Waitz

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]