From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Anderson Subject: Re: [RFC] gitweb wishlist and TODO list Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:47:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20060622144725.GB3154@h4x0r5.com> References: <46a038f90606201233p6283febbn9a46e36c3a666903@mail.gmail.com> <20060621130535.G2b34d382@leonov.stosberg.net> <20060622100024.G7f491d4a@leonov.stosberg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 22 16:47:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtQTA-000504-Sz for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:47:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161156AbWFVOrm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:47:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751267AbWFVOrm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:47:42 -0400 Received: from h4x0r5.com ([70.85.31.202]:49161 "EHLO h4x0r5.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113AbWFVOrl (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:47:41 -0400 Received: from ryan by h4x0r5.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1FtQSt-0006un-Bt; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:47:27 -0700 To: Dennis Stosberg Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060622100024.G7f491d4a@leonov.stosberg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-michonline.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-michonline.com-MailScanner-From: ryan@h4x0r5.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:00:25PM +0200, Dennis Stosberg wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > So now you have extra git redirector being spawned, instead of extra shell > > being spawned. > > Most of the commands that Gitweb uses are built-ins, so there > shouldn't be any extra overhead by calling "git command" instead of > "git-command". If I haven't missed one, git-annotate is the only one > which is not a built-in. git-annotate is a Perl script anyway, so it's not unreasonable to consider making it a .pm module and just using it directly in gitweb. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere