From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Kestenholz Subject: Re: [RFC] GIT user survey Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:15:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20060624221523.GA4335@spinlock.ch> References: <4d8e3fd30606240918m6b452314m6514b5e5fc86f147@mail.gmail.com> <94fc236b0606241455m22c4d285led04846a915267a2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 25 00:16:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuGPu-0003WR-Vp for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:15:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751122AbWFXWPi (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:15:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751123AbWFXWPi (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:15:38 -0400 Received: from mail19.bluewin.ch ([195.186.18.65]:8850 "EHLO mail19.bluewin.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbWFXWPh (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:15:37 -0400 Received: from spinlock.ch (62.203.220.178) by mail19.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.3.110.2) id 449253F800213409 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:15:36 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 15833 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:15:23 -0000 To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94fc236b0606241455m22c4d285led04846a915267a2@mail.gmail.com> X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux 2.6.17-rc5-gfb80a6e1 (i686) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 249B 3CE7 E6AE 4A1F F24A DC44 B546 3304 690B 13F9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Adrien Beau (adrienbeau@gmail.com) wrote: > > The results of the Mercurial survey have been posted there: > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/UserSurvey > > An interesting read. I find the answers to the question, what people most like to see improved interesting: The improvement which got mentioned most often was "merge across rename", something which git does already. It seems, that partial checkouts and truncated history are the only things left to implement for git from this list. I am looking forward to a git user survey! Matthias