From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: fork0@t-online.de (Alex Riesen) Subject: Re: CFT: merge-recursive in C (updated) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20060627223632.GB8177@steel.home> References: <81b0412b0606270848v2253209aw52466de632ab25c1@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Fredrik Kuivinen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 28 00:36:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvMAp-0005fi-Uh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422658AbWF0Wgp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:36:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422689AbWF0Wgp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:36:45 -0400 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]:9708 "EHLO mailout06.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422658AbWF0Wgo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:36:44 -0400 Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1FvMAc-0000Sc-00; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:34 +0200 Received: from tigra.home (Jr83DiZ-geG2qBbYeicjkuz5OsrD0xs6eqBcZqUpoYDTlk+UiMpVYU@[84.160.93.205]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1FvMAb-26OTsO0; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:33 +0200 Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915F0277B5; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from raa by steel.home with local (Exim 4.42 #1 (Debian)) id 1FvMAa-0003ZV-Ek; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:36:32 +0200 To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-ID: Jr83DiZ-geG2qBbYeicjkuz5OsrD0xs6eqBcZqUpoYDTlk+UiMpVYU X-TOI-MSGID: 30bc099c-8745-4243-8e27-ee88d9d156c3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds, Tue, Jun 27, 2006 21:10:07 +0200: > > HOWEVER, I think it is a very good start. It _works_, albeit slow, and we > > have test cases in place to make sure that our wonderful optimizations do > > not break the tool. > > Yeah, once it's all in C, it's going to be easier to move functionality > around incrementally. > That's why I started it: it'll eventually become so easy to move functionality around, that it will move all by itself and optimizes in a perfect code.