From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC] Cache negative delta pairs Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:35:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20060629213503.GA15604@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20060628223744.GA24421@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7v4py4y7wo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060629180011.GA4392@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060629185335.GA6704@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060629195201.GA10786@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 29 23:35:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fw4AJ-0008GA-Ln for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:35:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932746AbWF2VfH (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:35:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932745AbWF2VfG (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:35:06 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:30867 "HELO peff.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932746AbWF2VfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:35:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 11034 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2006 17:34:43 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2006 17:34:43 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:35:03 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 02:04:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Instead of having a separate cache, wouldn't it be much better to just > take the hint from the previous pack-file? I'd like to second Nicolas' "DOH!". This drops my nasty load with roughly the same effect as the delta cache, and it does the same for the kernel repo. And it doesn't consume any extra disk space. Junio, please drop my delta-cache patch in favor of Linus' patch. -Peff