From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: comparing file contents in is_exact_match? Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:15:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20060717181528.GA30212@admingilde.org> References: <87k66p8jee.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87fyh1ncm0.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20060716223607.GA6023@steel.home> <87d5c4ajlu.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Florian Weimer , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 17 20:18:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2Xd2-000675-Gd for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:15:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751110AbWGQSPd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:15:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbWGQSPd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:15:33 -0400 Received: from admingilde.org ([213.95.32.146]:38835 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751110AbWGQSPd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:15:33 -0400 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1G2Xcu-0004ls-PB; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:15:28 +0200 To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Imagine having a "map_packfile()" interface, and letting different target= s=20 > just implement their own version. That doesn't sound too bad, does it? we'd need something like that anyway if we want to support larger pack files. When it is only possible to map a part of the file into memory at a given time then we have to special case all accesses to the pack file, too. Or is there an easier way? --=20 Martin Waitz --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEu9PAj/Eaxd/oD7IRAojVAJ9IqXF4ZjenMF9KehHN/UawExMsCwCdFblG 4iFKhGynX7bdRtbiHdhJHQI= =sdrP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--