From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per branch properties for pull and fetch Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:02:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20060727120220.GD27593@admingilde.org> References: <87lkqfcvm2.fsf@gmail.com> <20060727085516.GC27593@admingilde.org> <8aa486160607270240h412b0dcek1d57eeb2b254fb2e@mail.gmail.com> <8aa486160607270306s3f49a01cq91ef61e2c9f005e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw" Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 27 14:02:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G64ZN-0004wn-FF for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:02:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750720AbWG0MCW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:02:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751062AbWG0MCW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:02:22 -0400 Received: from admingilde.org ([213.95.32.146]:41882 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750720AbWG0MCV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:02:21 -0400 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1G64ZJ-0005XF-0r; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:02:21 +0200 To: Santi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8aa486160607270306s3f49a01cq91ef61e2c9f005e@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:06:34PM +0200, Santi wrote: > >> could we default the to-be-merged branch to "remotes/$remote/$branch" = if > >> that exists?. That could make life a lot easier when using > >> clone --use-separate-remote. > On the other hand, my patch changes the behaviour only when explicitly > configured, and your proposed default would change the behaviour even > without changes to the config. that is correct. The current default is to always use the remote's master branch, right? What do others think: does it make sense to default to the same branchname on the remote side? It could make life a bit easier if you want to synchronize several topic branches between different sites. --=20 Martin Waitz --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEyKtMj/Eaxd/oD7IRAh57AJ4poOC23TuDSgjKedNtD+dQIDjvdQCfelLE l4dh7OQtDNf4W7SKJfavbRA= =HBtF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw--