From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: fill in gitweb configuration by Makefile Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:08:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20060731070819.GD16364@admingilde.org> References: <20060730223754.GA16364@admingilde.org> <7vzmeqa7tx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+g7M9IMkV8truYOl" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 31 09:08:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7Rt9-0007Za-FK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:08:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932504AbWGaHIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:08:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932508AbWGaHIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:08:22 -0400 Received: from admingilde.org ([213.95.32.146]:54239 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932504AbWGaHIV (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:08:21 -0400 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1G7Rsx-0001MG-PD; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:08:19 +0200 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vzmeqa7tx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:20:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think the other parts are sensible but I am not sure if we > want to report the version of git distribution (your patch), or > the version of git binary the cgi script happens to use (the > current implementation). hmm, right. Well, now that gitweb is included with GIT I think that they will be in sync on many sites, but of course that's not guaranteed. Shall I send a new patch without that change? --=20 Martin Waitz --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEzaxjj/Eaxd/oD7IRAvBPAJ0YmvlAbtqd4EM+/UnG2pNaVJBSkACfbGui 6z2VGFMuJZ1CY7yHUnZTCOw= =S60n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl--